Higher costs only make sense if they buy defined value. Look at the contract: did you pay for thicker base layers under patios, larger plant sizes, commercial-grade irrigation parts, or longer warranties? If so, the higher price was likely justified. If the specs were vague or generic, you may have paid extra without getting lasting benefit. The risk with choosing the lowest bid is that savings show up as thinner bases, undersized plants, or cheaper parts that fail quickly. Over time, extra maintenance and replacements erase the initial savings. The best approach is to compare contracts line by line before hiring. Price only matters when tied to measurable outcomes. A well-built project with durable materials should save money long term by avoiding rework. Spending more is worth it if the contract clearly defines what you’re getting—and those items protect performance, durability, and your overall satisfaction.
Should I have spent more for better quality with a landscape contractor?
Related FAQs
-
Is drainage supposed to puddle like that from a landscape contractor?
No — standing water usually signals a grading or drainage issue. In Salt Lake and Davis Counties, clay-heavy soils hold…
-
Can I trust a landscape contractor with my project?
Trust starts with credentials and transparency. In Utah, landscape contractors should carry an S330 license and current insurance. Ask for…
-
What’s the difference between a landscape architect and a landscaper?
A landscape architect is a licensed design professional who creates site plans, often for large or complex projects that involve…
